![turbo boost switcher for macbook pro 2017 turbo boost switcher for macbook pro 2017](https://www.macken.xyz/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Screen-Shot-2018-07-12-at-18.18.41-.jpg)
This test makes use of various algorithms to stress all available processor cores (real and virtual). Current CPU core clock frequency can be monitored (and graphed) using Intel Power Gadget.) (* Turbo Boost can be switched off with a utility called Turbo Boost Switcher.
#TURBO BOOST SWITCHER FOR MACBOOK PRO 2017 PLUS#
The core clock frequency is pegged during the rendering.Ģ017 3.5GHz i7 = 2017 MacBook Pro Retina 13-inch, 3.5GHz Dual-Core i7 processor (Turbo Boost 4.0GHz), Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU, 16G of 2133 MHz LPDDR3 memory, Four TB3 ports, Touch BarĢ017 3.1GHz i5 = 2017 MacBook Pro Retina 13-inch, 3.1GHz Dual-Core i5 processor (Turbo Boost 3.5GHz), Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU, 8G of 2133MHz LPDDR3 memory, Four TB3 ports, Touch BarĢ017 2.3GHz i5 = 2017 MacBook Pro Retina 13-inch, 2.3GHz Dual-Core i5 processor, (Turbo Boost 3.6GHz) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 8G of 2133MHz LPDDR3 memory, Two TB3 ports, NON Touch Bar We chose Cinebench because it forces all available CPU cores to be involved in rendering the 3D model. To test this hypothesis, we ran the Cinebench MP CPU test with and without Turbo Boost enabled*. Our hypothesis is that when Turbo Boost is disabled, the performance gap will grow.
![turbo boost switcher for macbook pro 2017 turbo boost switcher for macbook pro 2017](https://3arabon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/457973-apple-macbook-pro-15-inch-2017.jpg)
Posted September 13th, 2017 by rob-ART morgan, mad scientistĪt the end of a recent article, we mentioned that one possible reason for low level MacBook Pro nibbling at the heels of the mid level MacBook Pro was that when both are running in Turbo Boost mode, the CPU core frequency is very similar.